<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AI Reasoning on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</title>
		<link>https://aibussin.com/tags/ai-reasoning/</link>
		<description>Recent content in AI Reasoning on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:49:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://aibussin.com/tags/ai-reasoning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>The Moment: Intelligence beyond context</title>
				<link>https://aibussin.com/post/moment/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:49:56 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>https://aibussin.com/post/moment/</guid>
				<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Most AI systems answer and move on. The next step is different: preserve the reasoning state, replay it, measure whether it improves, and keep only what survives verification.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;summary&#34;&gt;Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Most AI workflows still treat intelligence as a single pass.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;You ask a question.&#xA;The model answers.&#xA;Maybe you ask it to try again.&#xA;Maybe you add more context.&#xA;Maybe you save something to memory.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But the basic shape remains the same:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Beyond Hallucination Energy: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Reliable AI Outputs</title>
				<link>https://aibussin.com/post/trendslop/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:35:46 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>https://aibussin.com/post/trendslop/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;-1--tldr&#34;&gt;🧩 1.  TLDR&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI doesn&amp;rsquo;t just hallucinate.&#xA;Sometimes it gives answers that are fluent, safe… and completely useless.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Most discussions about AI failure focus on hallucination:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;making things up&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;getting facts wrong&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;fabricating sources&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s real. It matters.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But it&amp;rsquo;s not the most dangerous failure mode in production systems.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There is a quieter one.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A more subtle one.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;And in practice a more &lt;em&gt;pervasive&lt;/em&gt; one.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI systems often fail not by being wrong,&#xA;but by failing to think at all.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
