<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>SCM on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</title>
		<link>https://aibussin.com/tags/scm/</link>
		<description>Recent content in SCM on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:30:36 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://aibussin.com/tags/scm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>The Space Between Models Has Holes: Mapping the AI Gap</title>
				<link>https://aibussin.com/post/gap/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:30:36 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>https://aibussin.com/post/gap/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;-summary&#34;&gt;🌌 Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What if the most valuable insights in AI evaluation aren&amp;rsquo;t in model agreements, but in &lt;strong&gt;systematic disagreements&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This post reveals that the &amp;ldquo;gap&amp;rdquo; between large and small reasoning models contains &lt;strong&gt;structured, measurable intelligence&lt;/strong&gt; about how different architectures reason. We demonstrate how to transform model disagreements from a problem into a solution, using the space between models to make tiny networks behave more like their heavyweight counterparts.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We start by assembling a high-quality corpus (10k–50k conversation turns), score it with a local LLM to create targets, and train both HRM and Tiny models under identical conditions. Then we run fresh documents through both models, collecting not just final scores but rich &lt;strong&gt;auxiliary signals&lt;/strong&gt; (uncertainty, consistency, OOD detection, etc.) and visualize what these signals reveal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
